The decision in Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services is an example of a Special Master favoring medical records over familial testimony when determining how events are temporally related.
The decision in Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services is an example of a Special Master favoring medical records over familial testimony when determining how events are temporally related.
Stewart is an example of a Special Master giving the medical opinion of a treating physician significant positive weight in the decision-making process, when the treating physician was careful and took the proper steps to make a correct diagnosis.
Page 1 of 1 pages